Tano Case Study: Structuring a Ward-Level Get-Out-The-Vote Operation
A structural case study (placeholder pending real anonymized tenant data) showing how a ward-level GOTV operation can be organized around polling-station catchments.
Structural case study (placeholder). This outlines how a ward-level GOTV operation can be organized. It will be replaced with a real, anonymized tenant success story once platform usage accumulates.
The problem
A ward is small enough that a well-organized campaign can reach nearly every likely voter — yet large enough (multiple polling stations, thousands of voters) that coordination matters. The challenge is turning a supporter list into a turnout operation on election day.
The structure
A common ward-level GOTV structure organizes field resources around polling-station catchments:
| Role | Coverage | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Ward coordinator | Entire ward | Owns turnout target + reporting |
| Station captain | One polling station | Knows their catchment's supporters |
| Canvasser | A few hundred voters | Confirm supporter + GOTV on the day |
| Transport lead | Ward-wide | Moves voters/agents where needed |
Outcome metrics that matter
The metrics below are the structural shape of what a real case study would report here:
| Metric | Target shape |
|---|---|
| Supporters confirmed reached | ≥ 80% of supporter list |
| Polling-station coverage | 100% — agent at every station |
| Turnout uplift in target wards | Measurable vs. baseline |